When Ulises Perez skimmed through the reviewer comments he had received on his rejected application for the US National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP), he was taken ...
Peer review is often the key hurdle between obtaining some data and getting it published in the scientific literature. As such, it’s often essential to keeping questionable results out of the ...
As part of its overall strategy to strengthen audit quality, in 2014 the AICPA issued the discussion paper Enhancing Audit Quality: Plans and Perspectives for the U.S. CPA Profession, which provides a ...
S ay your department gets a green light to bring in an outside expert — typically, an academic in the discipline — to do a comprehensive evaluation of your program. How does the department decide who ...
You have /3 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in. Is your area up for outside evaluation? In higher education, we typically know these as external ...
We strive to innovate in our peer-review process, to improve its efficacy, quality and transparency. We are constantly monitoring and reviewing our efforts to address more closely the needs of the ...
Reviewers for the Communications journal series are entrusted to provide fair and detailed reviews for manuscripts under consideration at the journal. Reviewers are selected by both professional ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results